1. 2022;25;E999-E1008The Effect of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block With and Without Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative and Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Prospective Trial
   Randomized Controlled Trial
   Freideriki Sifaki, MD, Ioannis Mantzoros, MD, PhD, Eleni Koraki, MD, PhD, Stella Bagntasarian, MD, Panagiotis Christidis, MD, and Kassiani Theodoraki, MD, Phd.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in the Western world. While it is performed with minimally invasive procedures, patients often complain of moderate to severe postoperative pain, and the role of the anesthesiologist for its effective management remains crucial. Modern anesthesiology practices have embraced trunk blocks which can contribute to perioperative, multimodal analgesia. There is emerging literature about the favorable effect of erector spinae plane block in the reduction of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of preoperative bilateral erector spinae plane block when dexmedetomidine is added in the local anesthetic mixture in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a double-blind, randomized, controlled, prospective study.

SETTING: Georgios Papanikolaou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece.

METHODS: After Local Ethics Committee approval (No: 1146/7.10.2019, October 2019) and in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, the study was submitted to clinicaltrials.gov with reference number: NCT04587973. Sixty patients were randomized into 3 equal groups. Erector spinae plane block was performed in Group C with normal saline (N/S) 0.9%, in Group DR with ropivacaine 0.375% and dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg, and in Group R with ropivacaine 0.375%. The perioperative opioid consumption, pain intensity, time of first mobilization, hospitalization days, and satisfaction score of patients were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman test, as appropriate.

RESULTS: The perioperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in Groups R and DR as compared to Group C (P < 0.001). The median numerical rating scale (NRS) scores of patients at all time points were statistically different between Groups C and DR, as well as between groups C and R. Satisfaction score was significantly higher in Group DR as compared to Group C (P < 0.001), and mobilization time was significantly shorter in group DR in comparison to Group C as well as in Group R as compared to Group C (P = 0.015 and P = 0.035, respectively). Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was lower in Group DR in comparison to Group R (P < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting and duration of hospital stay of patients.

LIMITATIONS: The limitation of the study is the small sample size of the patients recruited, which may be the reason why no statistically significant differences were found in postoperative morphine consumption and postoperative NRS scores between Groups R and DR and in postoperative nausea and vomiting among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION: Erector spinae plane block performed either with ropivacaine or with a combination of ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine is a novel and safe method, which was found to be more effective compared to standard analgesia protocols in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and thus, it can improve the quality of perioperative analgesia.

KEY WORDS: Erector spinae plane block, dexmedetomidine, ropivacaine, preemptive analgesia, regional anesthesia, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, multimodal analgesia, adjuvants, general surgery